Activities & Events

The PCI Lab hosts a causal learning group consisting of students and faculty from diverse disciplines including statistics, epidemiology, political science, sociology, computer science, and more. Meetings are typically held on Fridays from 11:00 am – 12:15 pm PST. If you are interested in joining us, click here to be added to our email distribution list.

Additionally, you can find a listing of past and upcoming events
below.

2024

May 31

Gaussian processes for extrapolative inference -- a powerful tool for addressing model-dependency and uncertainty

CAUSAL LEARNING GROUP

Chad Hazlett, Doeun Kim, Soonhong Cho

May 24

Causal progress with imperfect placebo treatments and outcomes

CAUSAL LEARNING GROUP

Adam Rohde

May 10

Regression-based proximal causal inference

Distinguished Guest Speaker

Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen

Join us over Zoom for a talk with Dr. Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen on regression-based proximal causal inference (see details below).

When: May 10th @ 11:00am - 12:15pm PST

How to Join: Click on this LINK at the start of the event.

About this Talk: In observational studies, identification of causal effects is threatened by the potential for unmeasured confounding. Negative controls have become widely used to evaluate the presence of potential unmeasured confounding thus enhancing credibility of reported causal effect estimates. Going beyond simply testing for residual confounding, proximal causal inference (PCI) was recently developed to debias causal effect estimates subject to confounding by hidden factors, by leveraging a pair of negative control variables, also known as treatment and outcome confounding proxies. While formal statistical inference has been developed for PCI, these methods can be challenging to implement in practice as they involve solving complex integral equations that are typically ill-posed. In this paper, we develop a regression-based PCI approach, employing a two-stage regression via familiar generalized linear models to implement the PCI framework, which completely obviates the need to solve difficult integral equations. In the first stage, one fits a generalized linear model (GLM) for the outcome confounding proxy in terms of the treatment confounding proxy and the primary treatment. In the second stage, one fits a GLM for the primary outcome in terms of the primary treatment, using the predicted value of the first-stage regression model as a regressor which as we establish accounts for any residual confounding for which the proxies are relevant. The proposed approach has merit in that (i) it is applicable to continuous, count, and binary outcomes cases, making it relevant to a wide range of real-world applications, and (ii) it is easy to implement using off-the-shelf software for GLMs. We establish the statistical properties of regression-based PCI and illustrate their performance in both synthetic and real-world empirical applications.

About Dr. Tchetgen Tchetgen: Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen is The University Professor, Professor of Biostatistics at the Perelman School of Medicine and Professor of Statistics and Data Science at The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. He co-directs the Penn Center for Causal Inference, which supports the development and dissemination of causal inference methods in Health and Social Sciences.  He has published extensively on Causal Inference, Missing Data and Semiparametric Theory with several impactful applications ranging from HIV research, Genetic Epidemiology, Environmental Health and Alzheimer's Disease and related aging disorders. He is an Amazon scholar working with Amazon scientists on a variety of causal inference problems in the Tech industry space.  Professor Tchetgen Tchetgen is an 2022 inaugural co-recipient of the newly established Rousseeuw Prize for statistics in recognition for his work in Causal Inference with applications in Medicine and Public Health.

May 3

Safe learning outside of randomized trials: Application of the stability-controlled quasi-experiment to the effects of three COVID-19 therapies (with Wulf, Hill, Chiang, Goodman-Meza, Pasaniuc, Arah, Erlandson & Montague)

CAUSAL LEARNING GROUP

Chad Hazlett, Onyebuchi Arah, David Ami Wulf

April 16

Detecting and refuting monotonicity

CAUSAL LEARNING GROUP

Scott Mueller

February 16

Analyzing the impact of events through surveys: Formalizing biases and introducing the dual randomized survey design

CAUSAL LEARNING GROUP

Andrew Bertoli

February 9

Double robust, flexible adjustment methods for causal inference: An overview and an evaluation

CAUSAL LEARNING GROUP

Nathan Hoffmann

February 2

Causal estimands when competing events are present

CAUSAL LEARNING GROUP

L. Paloma Rojas-Saunero

January 16

Understanding regression’s “weighting problem” and its simple, longstanding, equivalent fixes

Causal Learning Group

Tanvi Shinkre